
98-inch TVs and larger – is it worth it?
Although we planned to take a break from shopping reviews, your questions motivated us to take action. This time, we’re checking what’s worth buying in the size of 98 inches and more. Just a few years ago, such screens were out of reach – projectors or TVs costing hundreds of thousands. Today, the situation looks completely different. Prices have dropped, and you can find 100-inch models for even under 2K. For many, this is a better choice than a projector – especially if you watch movies from 3 meters away, where the experience resembles a cinema screening. We’re focusing on classic TVs because at current prices, they perform much better than Laser TV. The latter handle light well and offer strong sources, but in terms of image quality, they still fall short of LCD and OLED screens. Micro LEDs? Great, but they cost as much as a premium car. We’ll leave those for a separate piece. In the meantime, we invite you to review the largest TVs!
What are the dimensions of a 100 inch TV? Also check 97", 98" and 115"
Before you decide to purchase a TV with a diagonal of 100 inches or more, it's worth checking how much space such a screen will occupy. TVs in sizes of 97, 98, 100, and 115 inches are massive – and although the differences in diagonal might seem small, the physical dimensions may surprise you. Such a huge TV resembles a King Size bed, only... glued to the wall. Below we present approximate dimensions of TVs without a stand (in centimeters):
Screen diagonal | Width (cm) | Height (cm) | Screen area (m²) |
---|---|---|---|
97 inches | approx. 215 cm | approx. 121 cm | approx. 2.60 m² |
98 inches | approx. 217 cm | approx. 122 cm | approx. 2.65 m² |
100 inches | approx. 221 cm | approx. 124 cm | approx. 2.74 m² |
115 inches | approx. 255 cm | approx. 144 cm | approx. 3.67 m² |
The largest TVs in the world – TCL X955 115” and Hisense UXNQ 110”
TCL 115X955 – the largest television





TCL X955 is currently the largest available LCD television on the market. It’s a design based on a VA panel and extreme MiniLED backlighting. This model offers over 20,000 local dimming zones and a peak brightness of up to 6000 nits. By comparison, the previously tested TCL C855 (65”) offered 2400 nits and just over 1000 zones. This means that the X955 is not only about 2.5 times brighter, but also produces significantly better blacks – each backlighting zone covers a much smaller area. The effect? Contrast and detail can resemble OLED… but in the form of a massive projector. Besides its size, the TCL X955 also boasts 144 Hz refresh rate, making it a fantastic choice for gamers and sports fans. If the C855 was impressive, the X955 might raise the bar even higher – delivering image quality that’s hard to find even in smaller premium models.
Like any television, the X955 is not without its drawbacks. Viewing angles – a typical issue for VA panels – remain a weak point. TCL doesn’t employ advanced filters to improve this aspect, so when viewed from the side, colors and contrast clearly lose quality. Another point is colour reproduction – based on experiences with other TCL MiniLEDs, we expect an artificially boosted colour palette, with brightness “on steroids” and at times overly aggressive dimming, which can lead to a loss of detail in dark scenes. These are typical traits of MiniLEDs, not just TCL.
Despite these nuances, TCL X955 is an absolute powerhouse, which can outshine nearly every projector during a night viewing. And in daylight viewing – there’s nothing to talk about. The quality, contrast, brightness, and HDR – at this size – are at a level that projectors can only dream of.
Hisense UXNQ 110” – the biggest rival to TCL X955?






Similarly, the new 110-inch Hisense UXNQ is presented, which is theoretically cheaper than the TCL X955 (although prices can change dynamically – so we remind you that you can negotiate the best deal at the dedicated number, even for smaller models). Although we have less data from tests, we know that the television uses an ADS panel – and that could be its advantage, as it provides significantly better viewing angles, which is crucial at such size. The black levels won't be as deep as in VA models, but according to the manufacturer, the UXNQ makes up for this with sheer power – the specification mentions 40 thousand zones of dimming and brightness up to 10,000 nits. Even if these values are theoretical, you can still expect very high luminance in real conditions. In terms of features, the UXNQ resembles the well-known Hisense U8N from our tests – it has the VIDAA system, a complete set of applications, 144 Hz refresh rate, and a very decent overall specification. Price? High, but at this scale, it's hard to find anything similar.
LG G4 and M4 97 inches – the most expensive and only OLEDs in this comparison





We're now moving on to somewhat smaller screens, though that certainly doesn't mean a lower price. The most expensive TV in the entire comparison turns out to be the LG M4 with a 97-inch diagonal, which can cost as much as AUD 135,000. It’s worth discussing it alongside the G4 model of the same size – both constructions are based on the same OLED panel and offer very similar picture quality.
The M4 stands out primarily due to its design and so-called wireless image transmission. Of course, power still requires a cable, but all other sources connect to a special box (known from the set), which wirelessly transmits the signal to the TV. This solution is reminiscent of Samsung's One Connect Box, but eliminates the need to run a cable to the screen itself. Is it worth paying an extra AUD 45,000 more than the G4 model for this convenience? In our opinion – not necessarily. While it may be an enticing solution for someone who is just furnishing a 300-square-metre apartment, for most users, the G4 will be a far more sensible choice. In terms of picture quality, LG's OLEDs from 2024 offer unrivalled contrast – blacks are perfect, and bright details stand out much more clearly against it than in MiniLEDs, even those with thousands of zones.
Unfortunately, the brightness of the largest G4 and M4 versions does not meet expectations when we're talking about a TV in the six-figure range, as the MLA (Micro Lens Array) technology, which significantly increases luminance in smaller variants, has not been applied here. As a result, the 97-inch versions of these TVs resemble the OLEDs from the C4 series more than the smaller G4 models. If someone is planning to purchase such a TV, it may be worth waiting another year – LG may introduce a new Tandem OLED technology then, which has the potential to eliminate this issue.
As a consolation, the fact remains that the manufacturer offers an impressive 5-year warranty on the panel, which is of immense importance in this class of equipment. Replacing an OLED panel can indeed cost up to 80% of the entire device's price – and that’s already in the price range of a new car from the showroom.
Samsung QN90D 98 inches – big screen, but without compromises?



The next model on our list – sorted by price – is the Samsung 98QN90D, which is the largest representative of the QN90 series, also available in versions labelled as QN92 or QN94 (depending on the sales network). In theory, we should be dealing with a premium class television, but the specifications reveal several significant differences compared to the smaller variants.
The QN90 series is very popular among our calibration customers; however, we have not encountered the 98-inch variant even once. We were hoping for the presence of the Ultra Viewing Angle filter, which substantially improves viewing angles – as is clearly visible in one of our recordings:
Ultra Viewing Angle
Wide Viewing Angle
Unfortunately, the 98QN90D has been classified by Samsung as a Wide Viewing Angle, which means a standard VA panel without an additional layer to improve angles – this signifies classic limitations when viewing from the side.
The differences don’t end there. The 98QN90D model offers 120 Hz refresh rate, while the smaller diagonals of the same series already support 144 Hz. It may not be a critical flaw, but at a price reaching 40,000 zł, such simplifications may raise concerns – especially since the Q80C model costs less than half that amount, offering a very competitive price-to-quality ratio in many aspects. But we will discuss that shortly.
Sony X90L 98 inches – the perfect balance for demanding users



From this moment, we are entering the segment of large TVs "for the people." All the following models cost below 5,000 $, which in our opinion is a reasonable price range when purchasing a screen with a 98-inch diagonal. The most expensive in this category is the Sony X90L, a model from 2023 that received a significant software update in 2024 and remained on sale for another season. Sony, unlike many competitors, does not boast about the number of local dimming zones or maximum brightness. Instead, it focuses on perfect image processing – and this aspect makes the biggest difference with such large diagonals. Thanks to refined algorithms, even the darkest scenes retain detail and appropriate brightness, without artificially boosting contrast or colours.
This is also one of the few models that handles low-quality sources excellently, such as cable television or YouTube – mainly due to advanced features of upscaling and posterization reduction. With a screen this size, it makes a huge difference – every weak material is visible here, and Sony can work miracles. It is not a TV without flaws – viewing angles are limited, and black levels are slightly weaker than some competitors with MiniLEDs. Nevertheless, we believe that Sony X90L is the best compromise for those looking for a large, solid, and naturally looking picture. If you care about quality without unnecessary gimmicks, and especially if you plan on professional calibration, this model will be one of the safest choices in the LCD segment.
TCL C855 vs Hisense U7KQ – MiniLEDs in a Chinese showdown
The next two TVs in our lineup are similar enough that it's worth discussing them together. We're talking about the 98-inch TCL C855 and the 100-inch Hisense U7KQ. The first one is a well-known model – we've had the opportunity to test its smaller versions, so you'll find a full review on the website as well as in the video material. Hisense, on the other hand, is slightly bigger, and its designation reveals that it's a model from 2023 – the largest version of the U7KQ is also being offered for the 2025 season. Both TVs are based on MiniLED technology, offering around 1500 local dimming zones. The algorithms perform very well – blacks look deep and even. In terms of HDR brightness, both models perform excellently, though we had the impression that Hisense has a slight edge in the brightest scenes. Both constructions support all the main HDR formats, including Dolby Vision, so they will be compatible with almost any content source.
Both TCL and Hisense offer 144 Hz refresh rates, and Hisense U7KQ also supports 240 Hz in Full HD – more of a curiosity than a real advantage, but gamers will certainly appreciate it. In terms of gaming features, the TVs are neck and neck – Hisense doesn’t support HGiG, which may result in less visibility of details in bright parts of games. On the other hand, TCL artificially boosts brightness in Game mode, which can be a bit tiring during night sessions.
The biggest differences are visible in the operating systems. TCL opts for Google TV, while Hisense uses its own proprietary VIDAA system. There's no clear winner here – it all depends on your preferences. It's worth checking both systems in-store or analysing the availability of features that are key for you. And if anyone still uses teletext… well, TCL doesn’t support it 😉
And now, seriously. Both TVs offer a lot for reasonable money, have excellent parameters, and the differences between them mainly come down to the operating system and minor nuances. Our somewhat subjective favourite in this pair would be Hisense, but each of them is a strong option.
Samsung Q80C – budget alternative for gamers. What size TV for gamers?





An alternative to the TCL C855 and Hisense U7KQ models is the Samsung Q80C – a 2023 model that is also being offered for the 2025 season. Although it is not a MiniLED TV (due to only about 120 local dimming zones), it shouldn’t be discounted from the list of contenders.
Samsung has been developing dimming algorithms for years, which work exceptionally well – especially in films with black bars and in darker HDR scenes. We had the opportunity to calibrate a few Q80C units and we can confirm that the picture, while not top-tier, deserves to be called premium class. The contrast is very good, and the HDR effect can be impressive, particularly in typical home conditions.
One of the main downsides of this model is the lack of support for Dolby Vision, which can practically mean less precise rendering of bright lighting effects – especially in demanding movie scenes. Here, TVs from TCL and Hisense will have the advantage.
However, Samsung makes up for it with an intuitive Tizen system and interesting additional features – including the ability to increase the frame rate when gaming on a console. This is exactly what makes the Q80C a great choice for gamers, even better than the more technically advanced, but less refined models from Chinese manufacturers.
TCL MQLED85 (C765) and C805 – is it worth paying extra, or is it better to save?






The direct competitor to Samsung, due to a price of around 4,000 $, is the TCL MQLED85, also known as the C765. It can be described as a slightly less powerful version of the C855 model – it has fewer dimming zones and lower brightness. This TV already has its dedicated test on our channel, so we refer you there for more details. However, in our opinion, it doesn’t make much sense to buy it, as the significantly stronger C855 is just 500 $ more expensive. In this case, we definitely recommend the extra cost.
At this point, it’s also worth mentioning the TCL C805 model, which is the predecessor to the MQLED from 2023. Those looking to come closer to a budget of 2,000 $ can confidently consider it. It differs from the MQLED in having slightly lower brightness and fewer dimming zones. The C805 also had a few more software issues, but it’s a design that has been on the market for a long time, and most errors should have already been resolved.
We believe that the C805 is a good choice for those who want a TV from the premium segment but do not require the highest specs and prefer to save some money.
Xiaomi MAX 2025 – the biggest screen at the lowest price



In this place, we break the barrier of 10,000 zł. All the TVs presented below can be purchased for a four-digit amount. However, it should be remembered that with sizes close to 100 inches, this means the need for compromises – primarily the lack of local dimming, so blacks will be average and brightness moderate. Every dollar goes here into size, not quality. At the forefront of this group is the Xiaomi MAX 2025. Is it cheap? It is cheap. Is it good? It is… cheap. This model has not been tested by us, but based on previous experiences with Xiaomi, one can predict what to expect. On paper, it looks good: Dolby Vision, a wide QLED colour gamut, 240 Hz mode, as well as a full set of features for gamers – VRR, ALLM and more. The problem is that Xiaomi often disappoints in practice: the system can hang, image scaling is poor, and optimization leaves a lot to be desired. For 9000 zł, it’s hard to recommend this model sight unseen.


Hisense E7NQ PRO – budget competitor TCL C805





The direct competitor of the TCL C805 is the Hisense E7NQ Pro, which is currently about 1000 zł cheaper. There is also a model E7NQ without the “Pro” suffix available, but we are not able to clearly identify the differences – we haven't had the non-PRO version in the lab yet. However, experience shows that the “Pro” suffix usually indicates the presence of local dimming, which is crucial for picture quality. Therefore, it's worth focusing on this version.
The E7NQ Pro model is a solid mid-range option – it provides decent blacks, basic HDR effect, and a 144Hz panel, making it an attractive choice for gamers. The operating system VIDAA runs smoothly and doesn’t present major issues. However, it’s important to remember that the lack of HGiG support may negatively impact HDR quality in games – details in the highlights may be less distinct. Therefore, if the TV is primarily for gaming, TCL C805 would be a better choice. On the other hand, if it’s mainly for movies and series, and you are happy with the VIDAA interface – you can confidently save a thousand, gaining an additional two inches in diagonal size.
TCL C69B / C655 – the best choice under 10,000 zł




In our opinion, the most sensible choice under 10,000 zł is the TCL C69B, also known as the C655. Although it's also a television from a Chinese manufacturer, TCL specialises in screens rather than a whole range of electronics. We're familiar with the C655 – you can find a review of this model on our portal. The 98-inch version performs better than the smaller variants – it offers full HDMI 2.1 with 4K 144 Hz support, a good motion smoother, and also Google TV, which runs smoothly and provides access to all key applications. It currently represents the best quality-to-price compromise in this class.
Metz 100K8500Z – German Chinese?




Next on the list is Metz 100K8500Z – and that's pretty much all we can say about it. We don't know this model, we haven't seen anyone buy it, and we likely wouldn't choose it ourselves either. It's only 200 zł cheaper than the proven TCL, and based on the specifications and scant data available online, we don't see any real advantage. If any of you own it – be sure to let us know in the comments.
TCL 98P745 – the cheapest, but not necessarily worth buying




At the bottom of the list is TCL 98P745 – the cheapest 98-inch TV on the market. Our advice? Don't buy it. Besides its enormous size, it offers practically nothing. Saving a thousand $ compared to better models means lower brightness, a lack of a wide colour range, and generally worse viewing experiences. Despite the claimed 144 Hz refresh rate, this model just doesn't make sense. In 2025, for around 1500$ , we won't be able to buy a decent 98-inch TV. If the budget doesn't allow for anything more, it's better to consider a smaller size – unless it's just about impressing guests. The only question is: will a dark and unattractive picture really make a good impression?
Is it worth buying a 100-inch TV or larger?
With this note, we wrap up our list of televisions with a diagonal of 100 inches and more. As we can see, this segment is not only diverse but also remarkably interesting. Here we find both reasonably priced mid-range models and absolute technological monsters that can be compared to Bugatti or Koenigsegg in the world of screens – we’re referring to Hisense 110UXNQ and TCL 115X955. We believe that a reasonable budget for a 100-inch television should start at around 2,500 $ if we want to buy something truly worthwhile. Ideally – around 3,000 $, because at this price you can already find well-equipped models with local dimming and good HDR. Unfortunately, OLEDs in this size class still perform poorly compared to their smaller counterparts. Currently, the only options are very expensive LG models (like M4 and G4), which offer worse specifications than their smaller equivalents. However, if someone has fallen in love with the precise contrast of OLED, we understand this choice...
Easter Egg: LG QNED89T – a mysterious player from the chaos of specifications




Did you think this was the end? We have one more model – LG QNED89T, a TV that has become somewhat of an ‘easter egg’ in this review. It’s a product from a renowned brand, yet… no one really knows what it actually is. With a price tag of 5,000 $, one would expect clear specifications and solid features. However, after a few hours of research, we discovered that every source provides something different. Some stores mention the presence of Dolby Vision, while others don’t mention it at all. Some say it’s Direct LED without local dimming, while others claim that local dimming is indeed included.
In the end, we managed to establish that local dimming is most likely present, although the number of zones is unknown. Dolby Vision? Probably not, since the manufacturer themselves does not confirm it.
Our advice? For 5 thousand $, it’s not worth buying a pig in a poke. If you have that kind of budget, we highly recommend a professional shopping consultation, which will help you avoid similar dilemmas and choose a model perfectly suited to your needs.