XIAOMI A PRO 2025 vs Philips PUS8209

Direct compare

PUS8209

Available screen sizes: 43”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”

Panel technology: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

Operating system: Google TV

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel technology: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

Operating system: Titan OS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.6

5.3

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.7

    5.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.1

    6.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.1

    4.9

  • Gaming on console

    6.2

    6.6

  • TV as a computer monitor

    1.0

    2.0

  • Watching in bright light

    3.8

    4.4

  • Utility functions

    6.5

    5.0

  • Apps

    10.0

    6.0

  • Sound quality

    6.0

    5.0

Advantages

  • Expanded Google TV operating system

  • Voice control in Polish

  • Good image processing

  • High native contrast

  • Attractive price

  • High native contrast

  • Three-sided Ambilight system – unique wall lighting behind the TV, enhancing immersion while watching

  • Low input lag – around 13 ms

  • Has basic gaming features - VRR and ALLM

  • Support for Polish characters and subtitle customization – built-in player allows changing the color and size of the font

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS – a wide range of supported audio codecs

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness

  • Poor font readability

  • The system can lag

  • Titan OS operating system – limited number of applications

  • Poor brightness (280 nits) – issues with viewing in bright environments

  • Poor viewing angles – typical for VA panels

  • Issues with font display

Our verdict

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 is a device that caters to the needs of many basic users. As one of the most affordable QLED TVs available, it offers a good balance between price and quality. One of its standout features is the Google TV system, which provides seamless access to a variety of apps and multimedia content. The intuitive interface makes it easy to navigate popular streaming platforms such as Netflix and YouTube. Voice control in Polish adds further convenience, allowing users to issue commands without manually navigating menus. The completely wireless remote enhances usability, removing the need to aim directly at the TV.

In terms of picture quality, the TV delivers solid performance for everyday viewing. It handles tonal transitions smoothly and processes lower-quality materials effectively, resulting in a pleasing image for standard television programmes. However, its limited brightness may affect performance in brightly lit environments—an expected compromise in this price range. The inclusion of a basic motion smoother allows for adjustable fluidity in movies and series, making it suitable for less demanding viewers in terms of motion handling.

That said, the TV’s 60 Hz panel and lack of advanced features may limit its appeal for those seeking higher performance. Its low input lag will appeal to occasional gamers, but the device falls short for PC connectivity due to poor font clarity, which makes text work less enjoyable. Additionally, while the operating system offers extensive functionality, its responsiveness could be better.

Despite these shortcomings, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 remains a compelling choice for budget-conscious users seeking an affordable QLED TV with practical features and reliable performance for basic applications.

Philips PUS8209 is a model that stands out primarily due to its unique Ambilight system. The three-sided backlighting behind the television dynamically adjusts to the image, adding a special atmosphere while watching movies or playing games. This solution, which Philips is known for, makes a difference and can be a great choice for those looking for something more unconventional in their daily usage. In terms of picture quality, the television performs quite well, especially in this price range. The VA panel provides solid contrast and decent blacks, which works particularly well in the evening in dark rooms. Watching movies in such conditions is genuinely pleasant, although the screen brightness (280 nits) leaves a lot to be desired – in bright rooms, the image can look pale, and HDR content does not make a significant impression. As for gaming, the PUS8209 also has a few advantages. Support for VRR, ALLM, and a low input lag of 13 ms make gameplay smooth and responsive. Of course, this is not equipment for advanced gamers, but for those who occasionally pick up a controller, it should be sufficient. The biggest downside is the Titan OS operating system. Many popular apps are missing, and the interface does not always run as smoothly as one would wish. The remote, which requires aiming at the TV, can be irritating, especially in situations where quick response is expected. In summary: the Philips PUS8209 is a television that will serve basic purposes well. Ambilight adds uniqueness and enhances the atmosphere while watching. In daily use or occasional gaming, it holds up, but its limitations – particularly in screen brightness and the operating system – may be problematic for more demanding users. If we are looking for simple equipment with an unusual visual addition, this model is worth considering.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps

Where to buy

No links

No links

Contrast and black detail

5.9/10

6.6/10

Local blanking function: No

Local blanking function: No

Contrast:

Test XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Test XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,300:1

Test XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,200:1

Test XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,100:1

Test XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Test Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

8,050:1

Test Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

7,300:1

Test Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

10,200:1

Test Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

9,050:1

Test Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

8,200:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

The Xiaomi A Pro features a VA panel, which provides significantly better black depth and colour intensity compared to IPS panels, particularly in low-light environments. Testing revealed a maximum contrast ratio of approximately 6000:1, which is a solid performance for its category. This high contrast allows for good separation of image elements in darker scenes, enhancing visual quality. For instance, in the film Oblivion, the TV excelled at distinguishing bright and dark areas, effectively elevating the viewing experience.

However, the lack of local dimming technology—a common limitation in this price range—becomes apparent in more demanding scenes. In films like The Revenant, where intricate shadow details are critical, the black levels lose their intensity, appearing closer to navy blue. Without dynamic dimming, parts of the image that should be deeply darkened remain faintly illuminated, which can diminish the overall impact of darker sequences.

Despite this limitation, the TV’s strong contrast performance makes it a good choice for viewers prioritising deep blacks and vibrant colours, provided their expectations align with the TV’s price bracket.

Philips PUS8209 positively surprised us in terms of contrast, which is really solid for its price range. Thanks to the use of a VA panel, it achieved a contrast level of 8000:1, which can be considered a very good result in this price category. In tests using scenes from the movie Oblivion, the television performed well, offering visible light separation. Three independent light sources in the test scene were reproduced without major issues. Similarly, in the case of the film Sicario 2, where the black levels, although not perfect, appear decent, allowing for the differentiation of details in darker parts of the image. The lack of local dimming technology is noticeable, however, the manufacturer has implemented a "global dimming" feature. This mechanism allows the television to automatically dim or brighten the entire screen depending on the content, which somewhat improves the perception of contrast. Philips PUS8209 offers solid contrast and decent results in tests. Although it lacks the precision of local dimming, its capabilities at this price are satisfactory and will please most users.

HDR effect quality

3.2/10

3.7/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 92.0%, Bt.2020: 70.0%
DCI P3: 91.4%, Bt.2020: 67.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Test XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

205 nit

Test XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

220 nit

Test XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

243 nit

Test XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

213 nit

Test XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

237 nit

Test Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

231 nit

Test Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

268 nit

Test Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

278 nit

Test Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

274 nit

Test Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

281 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: HDR10+

HDR luminance chart:

Philips PUS8209

XIAOMI A PRO 2025

In the HDR category, the Xiaomi A Pro performs poorly overall. Under ideal conditions, it achieves a brightness level of around 250 nits, which is underwhelming. However, many competing models offer similar or even lower brightness levels. Such limited brightness is insufficient to fully showcase the potential of HDR content. In practical terms, the image lacks the depth and intensity expected from high-quality HDR. Instead, the visuals resemble standard dynamic range (SDR), with scenes that should display striking brightness and contrast appearing flat and uninspiring. That said, for its price, the television offers solid DCI-P3 colour gamut coverage at 92%, made possible by its quantum dot (QLED) technology. This ensures vibrant and saturated colours, making it an appealing choice for gamers and movie enthusiasts seeking richer hues and improved colour reproduction compared to standard models.

Unfortunately, this is where the problems begin. A maximum brightness of 280 nits is definitely too low to feel the true HDR effect. In practice, the image resembles standard SDR more, so it's hard to speak of deeper visual experiences. On the plus side, the color gamut coverage is commendable – 91.4% DCI-P3 is a result that will be sufficient for most films. It must also be noted that the image is stable and there are no issues with sudden changes in brightness or colors. Looking at the overall picture, HDR on this TV is more of a formality than an actual added value. If we are looking for true HDR emotions, this model may not meet expectations.

Factory color reproduction

5.1/10

6/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 performs best in movie mode for colour reproduction straight out of the box, though it is not without its flaws. An analysis of the white balance shows negative green values, causing distortions in white tones. At full white, there are noticeable deviations, and the high-contrast image leads to poor tonal transitions in red, negatively impacting the overall colour quality. Before calibration, the image often displays a pink hue in its scenery.

The gamma contrast graph falls below the 2.4 mark, indicating an overemphasis on darker tones and a lack of prominence in lighter areas. Additionally, the EOTF curve shows a sharp rise early on, which can result in lost detail in bright scenes and an oversaturated appearance. These issues suggest that further calibration is needed to balance the colour reproduction and enhance the overall image.

Factory colour settings on the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 are average, and while this is common in televisions of its class, users seeking accurate colour representation may need to adjust the settings. After proper calibration, the TV delivers a more natural and vibrant palette, aligning better with cinematic standards. For those prioritising precise colour reproduction, professional calibration will significantly improve image quality.

Philips PUS8209 offers many picture modes, but the best among them, without a doubt, is the Filmmaker mode. Despite its proud name, it has its clear issues. In the case of HD content, the white balance is characterized by a strong dominance of red, causing the image to be significantly warmer than it should be in reality. The brightness characteristic (gamma), although correct in the midtones, has serious problems at the beginning and end of the graph. Drops in the shadows lead to a loss of details in dark areas, and highlights in bright areas make some elements look unnatural.

For high-quality 4K HDR content, the situation reverses. In this case, blue dominates, leading to an effect of artificial image enhancement, reminiscent of unnatural store settings. Such an image looks unappealing and inconsistent with the creators' intentions. An additional problem is the EOTF curve, responsible for brightness in HDR materials. It deviates significantly from the reference chart, making the image appear too dark, robbing the depth and detail of HDR content.

Against this background, the errors in the Color Checker test and deviations in color palette reproduction are exceptionally large, which negatively impacts the overall image quality. The Filmmaker mode, although the best among the available options, requires significant corrections to fully deliver the director's vision.

Color reproduction after calibration

7/10

8.3/10

After calibration, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 TV shows significant improvement. The white balance is the most noticeable change, with previous errors corrected in HD and 4K content. Most deviations are now minimal, falling within an acceptable range, resulting in a more balanced and natural colour representation that enhances viewing comfort.

In terms of gamma, the drop has been largely addressed, leading to a more consistent rendering of tones across various scenes. However, the EOTF curve still hasn't seen substantial improvement, as there is limited control over dynamic tone mapping. This limitation means that some details may still be lost in bright scenes, affecting the perception of certain materials.

Despite these minor issues, the overall picture quality is improved after calibration. The enhanced white balance and reduced gamma issues provide a more realistic and enjoyable viewing experience. While further adjustments could enhance the image even more, the TV now showcases its potential, meeting the expectations of many users.

After calibration, the white balance for HD and 4K content has improved significantly. Although we did not achieve a perfectly flat characteristic, the effect is definitely better than before. The image on the television no longer appears artificially warm or overly cold, which significantly enhances the naturalness of the displayed content. The brightness characteristic (gamma) has also been adjusted - the biggest issues at the beginning and end of the graph have been mitigated. The EOTF curve, which is responsible for brightness in 4K HDR material, has been stabilized, eliminating problems with excessive dimming of the image. In the color palette test, some imperfections can still be seen due to average coverage of a wide color gamut, which is a limitation of the hardware itself. Nevertheless, the final effect is clearly better than before calibration - the image looks more natural and approaches the expectations for the Filmmaker mode.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.3/10

6.5/10

During testing of tonal transition fluidity, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 performed admirably. In most test sequences, there were no noticeable issues. Only in the scene with red water were there minor imperfections, but these were cosmetic and did not significantly impact the overall image quality. Both colour and grey gradients were reproduced with almost perfect accuracy, making this TV an excellent choice for those who prioritise this aspect of television performance.

Philips PUS8209 presents a decent gradation in bright scenes, where tonal transitions are smooth enough not to be distracting. Unfortunately, in darker scenes, such as red water, the television clearly struggles. Issues with blending shades and a lack of precision in reproducing subtle color differences are very noticeable here.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.9/10

5.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 handles tonal transitions effectively, especially when dealing with lower-quality materials. Thanks to its advanced digital processing, the colour contour removal feature performs surprisingly well. Setting this option to "Medium" provides the best balance, enhancing the smoothness of tonal transitions while avoiding excessive smoothing of other image elements, like film grain.

In the case of a tested frame featuring a model with numerous branches in the background, the TV demonstrated its digital processing strengths. Adding artificial sharpness clarified the model’s details, particularly enhancing the hair's definition. However, around the branches, subtle contours emerged due to digital intervention. While this adds detail to the overall image, excessive sharpness can sometimes cause certain elements to appear unnaturally highlighted.

The television offers a "Distortion Reduction" feature that effectively improves the gradation of tonal transitions, especially when set to the minimum level. Unfortunately, it comes at a price – the feature also smooths out details like the texture of materials. On the plus side, the operation of this option does not negatively affect the film grain, which remains intact.

As for image scaling (upscaling), the television generates a plastic, soft image that generally looks pleasant. However, in the background, one can sometimes notice issues with aliasing on some elements, such as branches or fine details, which can lower the quality of the reception. Despite these minor imperfections, the overall experience of scaling is satisfactory.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.3/10

3.8/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
No
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
Nie
Nie
BFI function 120Hz
Nie
Nie
Brightness drop with BFI
0%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 features a motion smoothing option known as "Motion Smoothing," which is designed mainly for film viewing. It allows users to adjust the effect to either a more cinematic, film-like appearance with visible frames or a smoother, theatrical image. This feature will likely satisfy movie lovers. However, gamers and sports enthusiasts might be disappointed. The TV uses a 60 Hz refresh rate panel, typical for this price range, which doesn’t offer exceptional motion handling. Our "Ufo" test revealed some motion blur, so those seeking sharper moving images may find it lacking in this regard.

The 60 Hz panel in the Philips PUS8209 is mainly suited for watching movies, but there is also a certain sense of dissatisfaction here. The TV does not offer any motion smoothing feature that would allow adjusting the smoothness of the picture to individual preferences, which may be disappointing for some users.

Console compatibility and gaming features

3.3/10

4.7/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    No
    Yes
  • VRR range
    No
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 includes several gamer-friendly features, such as the Game Bar, which sets itself apart from the typical dashboards seen in other brands. This feature allows quick access to game-related settings, making it convenient during intense gaming sessions. The TV also supports Automatic Low Latency Mode (ALLM), automatically switching to a game-optimised mode to reduce signal delays. However, it lacks HDMI 2.1 support, limiting compatibility with the latest gaming consoles that require higher bandwidth. Additionally, it does not support features like VRR (Variable Refresh Rate) or G-Sync, which are becoming essential for gamers seeking smoother visuals and reduced tearing. While the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 has some useful features, there are better options in this price range offering more advanced gaming solutions.

The Philips PUS8209 offers basic functions useful for gamers, such as variable refresh rate (VRR), automatic low latency mode (ALLM), and a Game Bar that makes managing settings easier.

Unfortunately, due to the 60 Hz panel, the television will not meet the expectations of more demanding gamers who are counting on higher fluidity and precision of the image. Additionally, this model does not support any HDR mode dedicated to games, such as HGiG or Dolby Vision, which further limits its capabilities in this regard.

Input lag

9.8/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
15 ms
13 ms
1080p120
2160p60
15 ms
13 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
14 ms
13 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 achieves excellent results, regardless of the resolution or HDR mode. With measurements as low as 15 ms, this television ranks among the best in terms of responsiveness.

Input lag in the Philips PUS8209 is one of its strongest points. With a value of around 13 ms, the TV provides a very quick response time, which should satisfy most gamers, both casual and more advanced. Such a result allows for comfortable gameplay even in dynamic games.

Compatibility with PC

1/10

2/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Average
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
105ms
13ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No

In the category of cooperation with a PC, Xiaomi A Pro 2025 performs very poorly. The fonts are of low quality, and their display on the screen is often problematic. Dithering is ubiquitous; when zooming in on the fonts against a dark background, they are displayed in three colours, which is definitely glaring and can significantly hinder the comfortable use of the device. Such problems can be a significant disadvantage for users who plan to use the television as a computer monitor.

On paper, collaboration with a PC seems promising, especially with support for chroma 4:4:4, which should ensure good font readability and detail reproduction. In practice, however, the television has significant issues displaying text, especially on dark backgrounds, where the so-called pixelation is clearly visible, negatively affecting work comfort.

Additionally, the lack of support for technologies such as G-Sync means that gameplay smoothness when connected to a PC leaves much to be desired, making this model less attractive for users looking for a television for gaming on a computer.

Viewing angles

2.6/10

2.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
81%
87%

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 performs poorly in terms of viewing angles due to its VA panel. While the TV offers better blacks when viewed directly in front, the image quality degrades significantly from side angles. During testing, our specialists observed that sitting just one metre from the device caused the image on the right side to appear brightened and desaturated. However, shifting slightly to the side improved the picture, highlighting the noticeable difference in image quality depending on the viewing angle. This makes the viewing experience less enjoyable for larger groups.

The viewing angles on the Philips PUS8209 are weak, which is typical for VA matrices. When viewing at an angle, the brightness of the image decreases significantly, and the colors lose their depth, which can significantly affect viewing comfort, especially in larger groups or in an unusual setup of the television relative to the viewer.

TV efficiency during daytime

3.8/10

4.4/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Average
Average
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

Philips PUS8209: 277 cd/m2

XIAOMI A PRO 2025: 249 cd/m2

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 presents itself as average. The screen coating is satin, which may help reduce reflections, but the suppression of reflections is average. The brightness of the television is only 250 nits, which is a relatively low result compared to other models on the market. As a result, during sunny days or in brightly lit rooms, the image quality may suffer, and details may be hard to discern.

The Philips PUS8209 is equipped with a satin coating on the panel, which only moderately suppresses reflections, which may be insufficient in brightly lit rooms. However, the biggest problem is the low brightness of 280 nits. In practice, this means that watching content during the day, especially in bright sunlight, can be challenging, as the image appears too dark to ensure comfortable use.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
PFS LED
PFS LED

TV features

6.5/10

5/10

  • Operating system
    Google TV
    Titan OS
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • AirPlay
    No
    No
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
  • Possibility to connect Bluetooth headphones to the TV
    Yes
    No
  • Possibility to simultaneously use Bluetooth headphones and the TV speaker
    No
    No
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    RF
    Infrared
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 stands out with its Google TV system, one of its key advantages. This platform provides access to a wide range of applications and streaming services, making the TV easy to use. It also features a voice assistant for streamlined navigation and quick content searches without the need to scroll through menus. A major benefit of Google TV is the ability to download virtually any app from the Google Play Store, allowing users to customise the TV to suit their preferences. Users can install streaming, gaming, and other apps, turning the TV into a multimedia entertainment centre. However, it’s important to note that this model lacks recording features and AirPlay, which may disappoint some users. Additionally, there are noticeable lag issues with the operating system, which can affect ease of use. On the plus side, the TV supports Bluetooth pairing with other devices and the remote control can operate without the need to aim at the screen, enhancing user comfort. Despite a few shortcomings, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 is a solid option for those seeking a modern TV experience.

Philips PUS8209 uses the Titan OS operating system, which, although easy to use, remains limited in terms of functionality. The number of available applications is small compared to more developed ecosystems such as Google TV, which may disappoint users accustomed to broader capabilities. Additionally, the lack of support for AirPlay limits collaboration with Apple devices, reducing the TV's flexibility in streaming content. The remote, although interesting, requires pointing at the screen, which may not appeal to everyone.

The absence of more advanced features like PiP (Picture-in-Picture) or program recording further limits the device's capabilities in everyday use.

Philips PUS8209 is a television that attracts attention with an interesting solution in the form of a three-sided Ambilight system, which dynamically lights up the wall behind the TV, adjusting its colors and intensity to the content displayed on the screen. This effect creates a sense of greater depth of image and enhances immersion, especially in darkened rooms. Unfortunately, its potential is limited by the Titan OS operating system, which leaves much to be desired. The limited number of applications and lack of support for popular features like AirPlay can be a significant drawback for more demanding users. While Ambilight sets this model apart from the competition, deficiencies in the operating system significantly impact the overall functionality of the television.

Playing files from USB

6.8/10

8/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 comes with a decent built-in media player that satisfies basic user expectations. However, it does have limitations, occasionally struggling with certain file formats, which could be a point of frustration. Thankfully, with access to the Google Play Store, users can easily download alternative media players to better suit their needs. In testing, we found that the TV's compatibility with apps is generally strong, and third-party media players work seamlessly. The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 runs on the Android TV platform, providing access to apps and streaming services. By installing alternative media players, users can overcome compatibility issues and enhance the TV’s functionality. This makes the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 a more versatile option, capable of meeting diverse media playback needs of users, including those with more demanding requirements.

The built-in media player in the Philips PUS8209 performs well in everyday use. It handles Polish characters in subtitles without any issues and allows for adjustments to the color and size of the font, which significantly improves the comfort of using this feature. More demanding users may notice some shortcomings in the supported file formats, but for most applications in everyday use, this player should be fully sufficient.

Apps

10/10

6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Viaplay
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
MAX
OK
Kodi
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Viaplay
No
Player_TVN
No
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
No
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
MAX
No
Kodi

Sound

6/10

5/10

  • Subjective sound quality:
    6/10
    5/10
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1:
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1:
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC):
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD:
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA:
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio:
    Yes
    Yes

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 offers surprisingly good sound quality for its price range. The audio performance is solid, meeting expectations for a TV in this class. Notably, it supports DTS audio formats, a feature often absent in even more expensive models. While this assessment is subjective and may differ based on personal preferences, the TV delivers a commendable audio experience for its price point.

The sound in the Philips PUS8209 can be described as average, typical for televisions in this price range. The 2x10 W speakers do not offer exceptional quality or depth, but they are sufficient for everyday TV viewing. A positive aspect is the wide range of supported audio codecs, such as Dolby Atmos and DTS, which can significantly enhance audio quality in conjunction with external sound systems like soundbars or home theater setups.