98-inch Televisions and Larger – Is It Worth It?

Although we had planned to take a break from shopping reviews, your questions motivated us to take action. This time, we are checking what is worth buying in the size of 98 inches and above. Just a few years ago, such screens were beyond reach – projectors or televisions for hundreds of thousands. Today, the situation looks completely different. Prices have dropped, and 100-inch models can be found for even less than 10,000 zł. For many, this is a better choice than a projector – especially if you watch films from 3 metres away, where the experience resembles a cinema screening. We are focusing on classic televisions because, at current prices, they outperform Laser TV significantly. The latter deal with light and offer powerful sources, but in terms of image quality, they still lag behind LCD and OLED screens. Micro LEDs? Great, but they cost as much as a premium car. We will leave them for a separate article. In the meantime, we invite you to take a look at the largest televisions!

What are the dimensions of a 100-inch television? Also check 97", 98" and 115"

Before you decide to purchase a television with a diagonal of 100 inches or larger, it is worth checking how much space such a screen will take up. Televisions in sizes 97, 98, 100, and 115 inches are enormous – and although the differences in diagonal may seem small, the physical dimensions can surprise you quite a bit. Such a huge television resembles a King Size bed, only... glued to the wall. Below are the approximate dimensions of televisions without a stand (in centimetres):

The largest televisions in the world – TCL X955 115” and Hisense UXNQ 110”

TCL 115X955 – the largest television

The TCL X955 is currently the largest available LCD television on the market. It is a design based on a VA panel and MiniLED backlighting – in an extreme version. This model offers more than 20,000 local dimming zones and a peak brightness of 6,000 nits. For comparison: the TCL C855 (65”) that we tested earlier offered 2,400 nits and just over 1,000 zones. This means that the X955 is not only about 2.5 times brighter, but also produces significantly better blacks – each dimming zone covers a much smaller area. The result? The contrast and detail can resemble that of an OLED… but in the format of a massive projector. Apart from its size, the TCL X955 also boasts a refresh rate of 144 Hz, making it an excellent choice for gamers and sports fans. If the C855 impressed, the X955 could raise the bar even higher – delivering image quality that is hard to find even in smaller premium models.

Like any television, the X955 is not without its flaws. The viewing angles – a typical issue for VA panels – remain a weak point. TCL does not employ advanced filters to improve this aspect, so when watching from the side, colours and contrast noticeably lose quality. The second issue is colour reproduction – based on experiences with other TCL MiniLEDs, we expect artificially boosted colours, "steroid-level" brightness, and at times overly aggressive dimming, which can lead to a loss of details in dark scenes. These are typical characteristics of MiniLEDs, not just TCL.

Despite the mentioned nuances, TCL X955 is an absolute powerhouse, which in a night viewing session can easily outperform nearly every projector. And in daytime viewing – there’s no comparison. The quality, contrast, brightness, and HDR – at this size – are at a level that projectors can only dream of.

Hisense UXNQ 110” – the biggest rival of TCL X955?

Similarly, the new 110-inch Hisense UXNQ appears, which is theoretically cheaper than the TCL X955 (although prices can change dynamically – that’s why we remind you that you can negotiate the best deal under the dedicated number, even for smaller models). Although we have less data from tests, we know that the television uses an ADS panel – and this could be its advantage, as it provides significantly better viewing angles, which is crucial at such a size. The blacks won't be as deep as in VA models, but according to the manufacturer, the UXNQ compensates for this with brute force – the specification mentions 40 thousand dimming zones and brightness up to 10,000 nits. Even if these values are theoretical, one can still expect very high luminance in real conditions. In terms of features, the UXNQ is similar to the well-known Hisense U8N from our tests – we have the VIDAA system here, a complete set of applications, 144 Hz refresh rate, and a very decent overall specification. Price? High, but at this scale, it’s hard to find anything similar.

LG G4 and M4 97 inches – the most expensive and the only OLEDs in this comparison

We are now moving down to somewhat smaller screens, though that does not mean a lower price. The most expensive television in the entire comparison turns out to be the LG M4 with a diagonal of 97 inches, which can cost up to 35 thousand. It is worth discussing it alongside the G4 model of the same size – both designs are based on the same OLED panel and offer very similar picture quality.

The M4 model stands out primarily for its design and the so-called wireless image transmission. Of course, power still requires a cable, but all other sources connect to a special box (known from the set), which wirelessly transmits the signal to the television. This solution is reminiscent of Samsung's One Connect Box, but eliminates the need to run a cable to the screen itself. Is it worth paying an additional 10 thousand more than for the G4 model for this convenience? In our assessment – not necessarily. While it may be an enticing solution for someone who is currently arranging a 300-square-metre apartment, for most users, the G4 will be a much more sensible choice. In terms of picture quality, LG's OLEDs from 2024 offer unbeatable contrast – the black is perfect, and bright details stand out against it much more clearly than in MiniLEDs, even those with thousands of zones.

Unfortunately, the brightness of the largest versions of the G4 and M4 does not meet expectations when we are talking about a television costing a six-digit amount, as the MLA (Micro Lens Array) technology, which clearly increases luminance in smaller variants, has not been implemented here. As a result, the 97-inch versions of these televisions resemble the OLEDs of the C4 series more than the smaller G4 models. If someone is planning to purchase such a television, it may be worth waiting another year – then LG might introduce a new technology called Tandem OLED, which has the potential to eliminate this issue.

On the bright side, the manufacturer offers a generous 5-year warranty on the panel, which is of great importance for this class of equipment. The replacement of an OLED panel can cost as much as 80% of the price of the entire device – and that is already the threshold of a new car from the showroom.

Samsung QN90D 98 inches – large screen, but without compromises?

The next model on our list – sorted by price – is the Samsung 98QN90D, which is the largest representative of the QN90 series, also available in versions marked as QN92 or QN94 (depending on the sales network). In theory, we should be dealing with a premium-class television, but the specification reveals a few significant differences compared to the smaller variants.

The QN90 series is very popular among our calibration clients; however, we have yet to encounter the 98-inch variant. We were hoping for the presence of the Ultra Viewing Angle filter, which significantly improves viewing angles – as can be seen perfectly in one of our recordings:

Ultra Viewing Angle

Wide Viewing Angle

Unfortunately, the 98QN90D has been classified by Samsung as a Wide Viewing Angle, meaning it features a standard VA panel without an additional layer to improve viewing angles – this signifies the classic limitations when viewing from the side.

The differences don't end there. The 98QN90D model offers refresh rate of 120 Hz, while the smaller diagonals of the same series support 144 Hz. This may not be a crucial flaw, but at a price reaching 10,000 $, such simplifications may raise concerns – especially since the Q80C model costs less than half of that amount, offering a very competitive quality-to-price ratio in many aspects. But we will discuss it in just a moment.

Sony X90L 98 inches – the golden mean for demanding users

From this moment, we are entering the segment of large "people's" televisions. All subsequent models cost below 5,000 $, which in our opinion is a reasonable price limit when purchasing a screen with a diagonal of 98 inches. The most expensive in this category is the Sony X90L, a model from 2023 that received a major software update in 2024 and remained on sale for another season. Sony, unlike many competitors, does not boast about the number of local dimming zones or maximum brightness. Instead, it focuses on perfect image processing – and this aspect makes the biggest difference with such large diagonals. Thanks to refined algorithms, even the darkest scenes maintain detail and appropriate brightness, without artificially boosting contrast or colours.

This is also one of the few models that handles low-quality sources excellently, such as cable television or YouTube – mainly due to advanced upscaling and dithering reduction features. With a screen of this size, it is of enormous importance – every poor material is visible here as if in the palm of your hand, and Sony can work wonders. It is not a television without flaws – viewing angles are limited, and black levels are somewhat weaker than those of some competitors with MiniLEDs. Nevertheless, we believe that Sony X90L is the best compromise for those seeking a large, solid and naturally looking image. If you care about quality without unnecessary gimmickry, and especially if you plan to have it professionally calibrated, this model will be one of the safest choices in the LCD segment.

TCL C855 vs Hisense U7KQ – MiniLEDs in a Chinese clash

The next two televisions in our comparison are so similar that it’s worth discussing them together. We are talking about the 98-inch TCL C855 and the 100-inch Hisense U7KQ. The former is a well-known design – we have already had the opportunity to test its smaller versions, so you can find a full review on the website as well as in the video material. Hisense, on the other hand, is slightly larger, and its designation reveals that it is a 2023 model – the largest version of the U7KQ is also being offered for the 2025 season. Both televisions are based on MiniLED technology, offering around 1500 local dimming zones. The algorithms work very well – black levels appear deep and uniform. In terms of HDR brightness, both models perform excellently, although we felt that Hisense has a slight advantage in the brightest scenes. Both designs support all major HDR formats, including Dolby Vision, so they will be compatible with virtually any content source.

Both TCL and Hisense offer 144 Hz refresh rate, and Hisense U7KQ additionally supports 240 Hz in Full HD – a curiosity more than an actual advantage, but gamers will surely appreciate it. In terms of gaming features, the televisions go head to head – Hisense does not support HGiG, which may result in less visibility of details in bright parts of games. On the other hand, TCL artificially boosts brightness in Game mode, which can be somewhat tiring during nighttime sessions.

The biggest differences are visible in the operating systems. TCL opts for Google TV, while Hisense uses its proprietary system VIDAA. There’s no clear winner here – it all depends on personal preference. It’s worth checking both systems in-store or analysing the availability of features that are key to you. And if anyone still uses teletext… well, TCL does not support it 😉

And now for the serious part. Both televisions offer a lot for reasonable money, have excellent parameters, and the differences between them mainly come down to the operating system and minor nuances. Our somewhat subjective favourite in this pair would be the Hisense, but each of them is a strong contender.

Just to remind you: For discounts, please contact us here:

• 📞 Call: 22 770 77 78

• ✉️ Write: biuro@choose.tv

Samsung Q80C – a budget alternative for gamers. What size television for gamers?

An alternative to the TCL C855 and Hisense U7KQ models is the Samsung Q80C – a design from 2023, which has also been kept in the offer for the 2025 season. Although it is not a MiniLED television (due to having only about 120 local dimming zones), it should not be dismissed from the list of candidates.

Samsung has been developing dimming algorithms for years, which work exceptionally effectively – especially in films with black bars and darker HDR scenes. We had the opportunity to calibrate several Q80C units and can confirm that the picture, while not top-tier, deserves the title of premium class. The contrast is very good, and the HDR effect can be impressive, particularly in typical home conditions.

One of the main downsides of this model is the lack of support for Dolby Vision, which in practice can mean less precise reproduction of bright light effects – especially in demanding film scenes. Here, televisions from TCL and Hisense will have the advantage.

However, Samsung compensates with an intuitive Tizen system and interesting additional features – including the ability to increase the frame rate when gaming on a console. This aspect makes the Q80C a great choice for gamers, even better than more technically advanced but less refined models from Chinese manufacturers.

TCL MQLED85 (C765) and C805 – is it worth paying extra or is it better to save?

The direct competitor of Samsung, due to its price of around 3,000$, is the TCL MQLED85, also known as the C765. It can be described as a slightly less powerful version of the C855 model – it has fewer dimming zones and lower brightness. This television already has its dedicated test on our channel, so we refer you there for more details. However, in our opinion, it doesn't make much sense to buy it, as the significantly stronger C855 is just 500 $ more expensive. In this case, we definitely recommend the extra payment.

At this point, it is worth mentioning the TCL C805 model, which is the predecessor of the 2023 MQLED. Those who want to get closer to the 2,500 $ budget can certainly consider it. It is distinguished from the MQLED by slightly lower brightness and fewer dimming zones. The C805 also had a few more software issues, but it is a design that has been on the market for a long time and most bugs should have already been resolved.

We believe that the C805 is a good choice for those who want a television from the premium segment but do not require the highest specifications and prefer to save a bit of money.

Xiaomi MAX 2025 – the largest screen at the lowest price

At this point, we break the barrier of 2,500 $. All the televisions presented below can be purchased for a four-digit sum. However, it is important to remember that with sizes close to 100 inches, this means the necessity of compromises – primarily the absence of local dimming, so black levels will be average, and brightness moderate. Every penny goes into size, not quality. Leading this group is the Xiaomi MAX 2025. Is it cheap? Yes, it is cheap. Is it good? It is… cheap. This model has not been tested by us, but based on previous experiences with Xiaomi, one can predict what to expect. On paper, it looks good: Dolby Vision, wide QLED colour gamut, 240 Hz mode, and a full set of gaming features – VRR, ALLM, and more. The problem is that Xiaomi often disappoints in practice: the system can freeze, picture scaling is poor, and optimisation leaves much to be desired. For 2,500 $, it is hard to recommend this model sight unseen.

Hisense E7NQ PRO – budget competitor of TCL C805

The direct competitor to the TCL C805 is the Hisense E7NQ Pro, which is currently around 1000 zł cheaper. On the market, we can also find the model E7NQ without the “Pro” suffix, but we cannot definitively point out the differences – we have not yet had the non-PRO version in our laboratory. However, experience suggests that the “Pro” suffix usually indicates the presence of local dimming, which is crucial for picture quality. Therefore, it is worth focusing on this version.

The E7NQ Pro model is a solid offering from the mid-range – it provides decent blacks, basic HDR effect, and a 144Hz panel, making it an attractive option for gamers. The VIDAA operating system runs smoothly and does not cause major issues. However, it is important to remember that the lack of HGiG support may negatively affect HDR quality in games – details in bright areas may be less clear. Therefore, if the television is primarily for gaming, TCL C805 will be a better choice. On the other hand, if it is mainly for movies and series, and the VIDAA interface suits you – you can confidently save a thousand zł, gaining an additional two inches in diagonal at the same time.

TCL C69B / C655 – the best choice under 2,500$

In our opinion, the sensible choice under 2,500 $ is the TCL C69B, also known as the C655. Although it is also a television from a Chinese manufacturer, TCL specialises in screens, rather than the entire catalogue of electronics. We are familiar with the C655 – you can find a review of this model on our portal. The 98-inch version performs better than the smaller variants – it offers full HDMI 2.1 with support for 4K 144 Hz, a good motion smoother, and also Google TV, which runs smoothly and provides access to all key applications. It is currently the best quality-to-price compromise in this class.

Metz 100K8500Z – German Chinese?

Next on the list is Metz 100K8500Z – and that’s really all we can say about it. We do not know this model, we haven’t seen anyone buying it, and we probably wouldn’t choose it ourselves either. It is merely 50 $ cheaper than the proven TCL, and based on the specifications and scant data available online, we see no real advantage. If any of you own it – please let us know in the comments.

TCL 98P745 – the cheapest, but not necessarily worth buying

The list is concluded by TCL 98P745 – the cheapest 98-inch television on the market. Our advice? Do not buy it. Apart from its enormous size, it offers practically nothing. Saving a thousand złoty compared to better models means lower brightness, a lack of a wide colour range, and generally worse viewing experience. Despite the claimed 144 Hz refresh rate, this model simply does not make sense. In 2025, for around 7000 zł, we will not buy a good 98-inch television. If the budget does not allow for anything more, it is better to consider a smaller size – unless it’s just about making an impression on guests. The only question is: will a dark and unattractive image really leave a good impression?

Is it worth buying a 100-inch television or larger?

With this emphasis, we conclude our list of televisions with a diagonal of 100 inches and more. As can be seen, this segment is not only diverse but also surprisingly interesting. Here, we find both reasonably priced mid-range models and absolute technological beasts that can be compared to Bugatti or Koenigsegg in the world of screens – we are referring to, among others, the Hisense 110UXNQ and TCL 115X955. We believe that a reasonable budget for a 100-inch television should start at around 2,000 $ if we want to buy something truly sensible. Ideally – around 3K, as this amount can already yield well-equipped models with local dimming and good HDR. Unfortunately, OLEDs in this size class still fall short compared to their smaller counterparts. Currently, the only options are very expensive LG models (such as M4 and G4), which offer inferior specifications compared to their smaller equivalents. However, if someone has fallen in love with the precise contrast of OLED, we will understand this choice...

Easter Egg: LG QNED89T – the mysterious contender from the chaos of specifications

Did you think this was the end? We have one more model – the LG QNED89T, a television that has become a kind of “easter egg” in this review. It is a product of a renowned brand, yet… nobody knows what it really is. With a price tag of 5,000 $, one might expect a clear specification and solid features. However, after several hours of research, we discovered that every website gives a different account. Some stores mention the presence of Dolby Vision, while others do not mention it at all. Some claim it is Direct LED without local dimming, while others insist that dimming is indeed present.

Ultimately, we managed to ascertain that local dimming is most likely present, although the number of zones is unknown. Dolby Vision? Probably not, as the manufacturer does not confirm this.

Our advice? For 5,000 $, it is not worth buying a pig in a poke. If you have such a budget, we strongly recommend a professional shopping consultation to help you avoid similar dilemmas and choose a model perfectly suited to your needs.