100", 98", and even 115" TVs. Which one is worth buying? A review of large TVs

Calendar 4/28/2025

98-inch and larger TVs – is it worth it?

Although we planned to take a break from shopping reviews, your questions motivated us to take action. This time we’re checking out what’s worth buying in the size of 98 inches and more. Just a few years ago, such screens were out of reach – projectors or TVs costing hundreds of thousands. Today, the situation looks completely different. Prices have dropped, and we can find 100-inch models for even below 2K. For many, this is a better choice than a projector – especially if you watch movies from 3 meters away, where the experience resembles a cinema screening. We focus on classic TVs because, given the current prices, they perform much better than Laser TVs. The latter handle light and offer strong sources, but in terms of image quality, they still fall short compared to LCD and OLED screens. Micro LEDs? Great, but they cost as much as a premium car. We’ll leave those for a separate material. In the meantime, we invite you to check out the largest TVs!

What are the dimensions of a 100 inch TV? Also check 97", 98" and 115"

Before you decide to buy a TV with a diagonal of 100 inches or larger, it is worth checking how much space such a screen will take up. TVs in sizes 97, 98, 100, and 115 inches are huge – and although the differences in diagonal may seem small, the physical dimensions can be quite surprising. Such a huge TV resembles a King Size bed, only it's... attached to the wall. Below are the approximate dimensions of the TVs without the stand (in centimeters):

Screen diagonal

Width (cm)

Height (cm)

Screen area (m²)

97 inches

approx. 215 cm

approx. 121 cm

approx. 2.60 m²

98 inches

approx. 217 cm

approx. 122 cm

approx. 2.65 m²

100 inches

approx. 221 cm

approx. 124 cm

approx. 2.74 m²

115 inches

approx. 255 cm

approx. 144 cm

approx. 3.67 m²

The Biggest TVs in the World – TCL X955 115” and Hisense UXNQ 110”

TCL 115X955 – the largest television

TCL X955 is currently the largest available LCD TV on the market. It features a VA panel and extreme MiniLED backlighting. This model offers over 20,000 local dimming zones and a peak brightness of up to 6000 nits. In comparison, the TCL C855 (65”), which we tested earlier, provided 2400 nits and just over 1000 zones. This means that the X955 is not only about 2.5 times brighter, but it also generates significantly better black levels – each backlighting zone covers a much smaller area. The result? The contrast and detail can resemble that of an OLED… but in the form of a huge projector. TCL X955, aside from its size, also boasts 144 Hz refresh rate, making it an excellent choice for gamers and sports fans. If the C855 was impressive, the X955 can raise the bar even higher – delivering picture quality that is hard to find even in smaller premium models.

Like any television, the X955 is not without its flaws. Viewing angles – a typical issue for VA panels – remain a weak point. TCL does not use advanced filters to improve this aspect, so when viewed from the side, colors and contrast clearly lose quality. Another concern is color reproduction – based on our experiences with other TCL MiniLEDs, we expect artificially boosted colors, with ‘steroid-like’ brightness and at times overly aggressive dimming, which can lead to a loss of detail in dark scenes. These are typical characteristics of MiniLEDs, not just TCL.

Despite the mentioned nuances, TCL X955 is an absolute powerhouse that dominates almost every projector during nighttime viewing. And for daytime viewing – there’s nothing to discuss. Quality, contrast, brightness, and HDR – at this size – are at a level that projectors can only dream of.

Hisense UXNQ 110” – the biggest rival to TCL X955?

Similarly, the new 110-inch Hisense UXNQ is theoretically cheaper than the TCL X955 (though prices can change dynamically – that's why we remind you that you can negotiate the best deal under the dedicated number, even for smaller models). Although we have less data from tests, we know that the TV uses an ADS panel – and this could be its advantage, as it provides significantly better viewing angles, which is crucial at such a size. The black won't be as deep as in VA models, but according to the manufacturer, the UXNQ makes up for it with brute force – the specifications mention 40 thousand dimming zones and a brightness of up to 10,000 nits. Even if these values are theoretical, we can still expect very high luminance in real conditions. In terms of features, the UXNQ resembles the well-known Hisense U8N from our tests – it has the VIDAA system, a complete set of apps, 144 Hz refresh rate, and a very decent overall specification. Price? High, but at this scale, it’s hard to find anything similar.

LG G4 and M4 97 inches – the most expensive and the only OLEDs in this comparison

Unfortunately, it seems that you haven't provided the text for translation. Please provide the text you'd like me to translate, and I'll be happy to help!

Now we are moving down to slightly smaller screens, although this does not mean a lower price at all. The most expensive TV in the entire lineup turns out to be the LG M4 with a 97-inch diagonal, which can cost as much as 40 thousand $. It’s worth discussing it together with the G4 model of the same size – both constructs are based on the same OLED panel and offer very similar picture quality.

The M4 model stands out primarily for its design and so-called wireless image transmission. Of course, power still requires a cable, but all other sources are connected to a special box (known from the set), which wirelessly transmits the signal to the TV. This solution is reminiscent of Samsung's One Connect Box, but eliminates the need to run a cable to the screen itself. Is it worth paying 10K $ more than for the G4 model for this convenience? In our opinion – not necessarily. Although it may be an enticing solution for someone who is just arranging a 300-square-meter apartment, for most users, the G4 will be a much more sensible choice. In terms of picture quality, LG's 2024 OLEDs offer unbeatable contrast – the black is perfect, and bright details stand out against it much more clearly than in MiniLEDs, even those with thousands of zones.

Unfortunately, the brightness of the largest G4 and M4 versions does not meet expectations when we talk about a TV for a 6-figure price, as the MLA (Micro Lens Array) technology that clearly increases luminance in the smaller variants has not been applied here. As a result, the 97-inch versions of these TVs resemble the OLED series C4 more than the smaller G4 models. If someone plans to buy such a TV, it might be worth waiting another year – then LG may introduce the new Tandem OLED technology, which has a chance to eliminate this problem.

As a consolation, the fact remains that the manufacturer offers as much as 5 years warranty on the panel, which is of great importance for this class of equipment. Replacing an OLED panel can cost up to 80% of the price of the entire device – and that's already the price level of a new car from the showroom.

Samsung QN90D 98 inches – big screen, but without compromises?

The next model on our list – sorted by price – is the Samsung 98QN90D, which is the largest representative of the QN90 series, also available in versions marked as QN92 or QN94 (depending on the sales network). In theory, we should be dealing with a premium class TV, but the specifications reveal some significant differences compared to the smaller variants.

The QN90 series is very popular among our calibration clients; however, we have yet to encounter the 98-inch variant. We were hoping for the presence of the Ultra Viewing Angle filter, which significantly improves viewing angles – as can be clearly seen in one of our recordings:

Ultra Viewing Angle

Wide Viewing Angle

Unfortunately, the 98QN90D has been classified by Samsung as a Wide Viewing Angle, meaning it has a standard VA panel without an additional layer to enhance angles – this results in classic limitations when viewing from the side.

The differences do not end there. The 98QN90D model offers 120 Hz refresh rate, while smaller sizes of the same series support up to 144 Hz. This may not be a crucial downside, but with a price reaching 10K $, such simplifications may raise concerns – especially since the Q80C model costs less than half of that amount, offering a very competitive quality-to-price ratio in many aspects. But we will discuss that model shortly.

Sony X90L 98 inches – the golden mean for demanding users

From this moment, we enter the segment of large televisions "for the people." All subsequent models cost below 5,000 $, which in our opinion is a reasonable price range when purchasing a screen with a diagonal of 98 inches. The most expensive in this category is the Sony X90L, a 2023 model that received a major software update in 2024 and remained on sale for another season. Sony, unlike many competitors, does not boast about the number of local dimming zones or maximum brightness. Instead, it focuses on perfect image processing – and this aspect makes the most significant difference at such large diagonals. Thanks to refined algorithms, even the darkest scenes retain details and appropriate brightness without artificially boosting contrast or colors.

This is also one of the few models that handles low-quality sources excellently, such as cable television or YouTube – mainly thanks to advanced scaling and dithering reduction features. With a screen of this size, it makes a huge difference – every weak material is noticeable here, and Sony can work wonders. It is not a television without flaws – viewing angles are limited, and black levels are somewhat weaker than those of some competitors with MiniLEDs. Nevertheless, we believe that Sony X90L is the best compromise for those looking for a large, solid, and naturally looking image. If you care about quality without unnecessary flashiness, especially if you plan on professional calibration, this model will be one of the safest choices in the LCD segment.

TCL C855 vs Hisense U7KQ – MiniLEDs in the Chinese showdown

The next two televisions in our ranking are similar enough that it's worth discussing them together. We're talking about the 98-inch TCL C855 and the 100-inch Hisense U7KQ. The former is a well-known design – we have already had the chance to test its smaller versions, so you will find a full review both on the website and in the video material. Hisense, on the other hand, is slightly larger, and its designation reveals that it's a 2023 model – the largest version of the U7KQ has also been kept in the lineup for the 2025 season. Both televisions are based on MiniLED technology, offering around 1500 local dimming zones. The algorithms perform very well – the black levels appear deep and even. Also in terms of HDR brightness, both models perform excellently, although we had the impression that Hisense has a slight edge in the brightest scenes. Both designs support all major HDR formats, including Dolby Vision, so they will be compatible with practically any content source.

Both TCL and Hisense offer 144 Hz refresh rates, and Hisense U7KQ additionally supports 240 Hz in Full HD – more of a curiosity than an actual advantage, but gamers will surely appreciate it. In terms of gaming features, the televisions are neck and neck – Hisense does not support HGiG, which may result in less visibility of details in bright game areas. On the other hand, TCL artificially boosts brightness in Game mode, which can be a bit tiring during night sessions.

The biggest differences are visible in the operating systems. TCL opts for Google TV, while Hisense uses its proprietary VIDAA system. There's no clear winner here – it all depends on personal preference. It's worth checking both systems in stores or analyzing the availability of features that are crucial for you. And if anyone still uses teletext… well, TCL does not support it 😉

Now, seriously. Both televisions offer a lot for reasonable money, they have great specifications, and the differences between them mainly come down to the operating system and minor nuances. Our somewhat subjective favorite in this pair would be Hisense, but each of them is a strong option.

Samsung Q80C – a budget alternative for gamers. How big a TV for gamers?

An alternative to the TCL C855 and Hisense U7KQ models is the Samsung Q80C – a 2023 design that has also been maintained in the lineup for the 2025 season. Although it is not a MiniLED television (due to only about 120 local dimming zones), it shouldn't be written off the list of candidates.

Samsung has been developing dimming algorithms for years, which work exceptionally well – especially in films with black bars and in darker HDR scenes. We had the opportunity to calibrate several Q80C units and can confirm that the image, while not top-tier, deserves the title of premium class. The contrast is very good, and the HDR effect can be impressive, especially in typical home conditions.

One of the main downsides of this model is the lack of support for Dolby Vision, which in practice can mean less accurate reproduction of bright lighting effects – particularly in demanding film scenes. Here, televisions from TCL and Hisense will have the advantage.

However, Samsung makes up for this with an intuitive Tizen system and interesting additional features – including the ability to increase the frame rate when playing on a console. It is this aspect that makes the Q80C a great choice for gamers, even better than more technically advanced but less refined models from Chinese manufacturers.

TCL MQLED85 (C765) and C805 – is it worth the extra cost, or is it better to save?

The direct competitor of Samsung, due to the price of around 4K $, is the TCL MQLED85, also known as C765. It can be described as a slightly less powerful version of the C855 model – it has fewer dimming zones and lower brightness. This television already has a dedicated test on our channel, so we refer you there for more details. However, in our opinion, it doesn't make much sense to buy it, as the significantly stronger C855 is just 1K more expensive. In this case, we definitely recommend the additional cost.

At this point, it's worth mentioning the TCL C805 model, the predecessor of the MQLED from 2023. People who want to get closer to the 2,500$ budget can confidently consider it. It differs from the MQLED by having slightly lower brightness and fewer dimming zones. The C805 also had a few more software issues, but it's a design that's been on the market for a long time, and most bugs should already be resolved.

We believe that the C805 is a good choice for those who want a television from the premium segment but do not require the highest parameters and prefer to save some money.

Xiaomi MAX 2025 – the largest screen at the lowest price

In this place, we break the barrier of 2,500 $. All the televisions presented below can be purchased for a four-digit amount. However, it is important to remember that with sizes close to 100 inches, this means the necessity of compromises – primarily the lack of local dimming, so blacks will be average and brightness moderate. Every penny goes into size, not quality. At the forefront of this group is the Xiaomi MAX 2025. Is it cheap? It is cheap. Is it good? It is… cheap. This model has not been tested by us, but based on previous experiences with Xiaomi, one can predict what to expect. On paper, it looks good: Dolby Vision, wide QLED color gamut, 240 Hz mode, as well as a full set of features for gamers – VRR, ALLM, and more. The problem is that Xiaomi often disappoints in practice: the system can freeze, image scaling is poor, and optimization leaves much to be desired.

Black on a television with local dimming technology and without. The difference is enormous.

Hisense E7NQ PRO – budget competitor of TCL C805

The direct competitor of the TCL C805 is the Hisense E7NQ Pro, which is currently about 250$ cheaper. We can also find the model E7NQ without the “Pro” designation, but we are unable to clearly identify the differences – we have not yet had the non-PRO version in the lab. However, experience shows that the “Pro” designation usually indicates the presence of local dimming, which is crucial for picture quality. Therefore, it is worth focusing on this version.

The E7NQ Pro model is a solid mid-range offering – it provides decent blacks, basic HDR effect, and a 144 Hz panel, making it an attractive option for gamers. The VIDAA operating system runs smoothly and does not pose major issues. However, it should be noted that the lack of HGiG support may negatively affect HDR quality in games – details in highlights may be less clear. Therefore, if the TV is primarily intended for gaming, TCL C805 will be a better choice. On the other hand, if the focus is mainly on movies and series, and you like the VIDAA interface – you can confidently save a thousand $, gaining an additional two inches in diagonal.

TCL C69B / C655 – the best choice under 2,5K $

In our opinion, the most sensible choice under 2,000 $ is the TCL C69B, also known as the C655. Although this is also a TV from a Chinese manufacturer, TCL specializes in screens, not in the entire catalog of electronics. We know the C655 well – you can find the test of this model on our portal. The 98-inch version performs better than the smaller variants – it offers full HDMI 2.1 with 4K 144 Hz support, a good motion smoother, as well as Google TV, which works smoothly and provides access to all the key applications. This is currently the best quality-to-price compromise in this class.

Metz 100K8500Z – German cheapo?

Next on the list is Metz 100K8500Z – and that's actually all we can say about it. We don't know this model, we haven't seen anyone purchase it, and we probably wouldn't decide on it either. It's only 200 zł cheaper than the proven TCL, and based on the specifications and scant data available online, we don't see any real advantages. If any of you own it – be sure to let us know in the comments.

TCL 98P745 – the cheapest, but not necessarily worth buying

The list is closed by TCL 98P745the cheapest 98-inch TV on the market. Our advice? Don't buy it. Aside from its enormous size, it offers virtually nothing. The savings of a thousand compared to better models means lower brightness, lack of a wide color palette, and generally worse viewing experiences. Despite the claimed refresh rate of 144 Hz, this model just doesn't make sense. In 2025, for around 2000 $, we won't buy a good 98-inch TV. If the budget doesn't allow for anything more, it's better to consider a smaller size – unless it's just for impressing guests. The only question is: will a dark and unattractive image really make a good impression?

Is it worth buying a 100-inch or larger TV?

With this note, we close our list of televisions with a diagonal of 100 inches and more. As you can see, this segment is not only diverse but also surprisingly interesting. Here, we find both reasonably priced mid-range models and absolute technological monsters that can be compared to Bugatti or Koenigsegg in the world of screens – we are referring, among others, to the Hisense 110UXNQ and TCL 115X955. We believe that a reasonable budget for a 100-inch television should start at around 2,500 $, if we want to buy something truly sensible. Optimally – around 4,000 $, because in this price range you can already find well-equipped models with local dimming and good HDR. Unfortunately, OLEDs in this size class still perform poorly compared to their smaller counterparts. Currently, the only choices are very expensive LG models (like M4 and G4), which offer poorer specifications than their smaller equivalents. However, if someone has fallen in love with the precise contrast of OLED, we will understand this choice...

Easter Egg: LG QNED89T – a mysterious player from the chaos of specifications

Did you think this was the end? We have one more model – LG QNED89T, a television that has become a sort of "easter egg" in this review. It's a product from a renowned brand, yet… no one really knows what it is. With a price of 5,000 $, one would expect a clear specification and solid features. However, after several hours of research, we discovered that every source provides different information. Some stores mention the presence of Dolby Vision, while others don't mention it at all. Some claim it's Direct LED without local dimming, while others say that dimming is indeed available.

Ultimately, we managed to establish that local dimming is likely present, although the number of zones is unknown. Dolby Vision? Probably not, since the manufacturer does not confirm it.

Our advice? For 5 thousand $, it’s not worth buying a pig in a poke. If you have such a budget, we definitely recommend a professional shopping consultation, which will help you avoid similar dilemmas and choose a model perfectly suited to your needs.