Philips PUS7009 (IPS) vs Philips PUS8079

Direct compare

Available screen sizes: 43”55”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.5

4.6

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    4.8

    4.3

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.2

    4.9

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.4

    4.5

  • Gaming on console

    6.4

    6.2

  • TV as a computer monitor

    5.0

    2.0

  • Watching in bright light

    4.5

    2.6

  • Utility functions

    6.8

    5.0

  • Apps

    7.0

    7.0

  • Sound quality

    5.6

    5.1

Advantages

  • Good viewing angles (IPS) - much better than the VA matrix variant

  • The dynamic tone mapping function improves image quality in demanding scenes

  • Okay for casual gamers - VRR, ALLM, low input lag

  • Support for all popular audio formats, including Dolby and DTS

  • Good font readability when connected to a PC

  • Unique Ambilight system

  • Great fluidity of tonal transitions

  • Low input lag values

  • Good built-in file player

  • Support for DTS audio

Disadvantages

No like
  • Poor blacks and weak contrast due to the use of an IPS panel

  • Very weak brightness (250 nits)

  • Poorly developed operating system - TitanOS

  • No support for Dolby Vision

  • No motion smoothing feature in movies

  • Low display brightness

  • Missing Dolby Vision

  • IR remote - requires aiming at the screen

  • TitanOs system - limited number of applications

Our verdict

Philips PUS7009 is a model that is best suited for simple, everyday use. Thanks to its IPS panel, it offers wide viewing angles, which means the picture looks good even if we are not sitting directly in front of it. This is equipment that will mainly work well for watching TV, browsing photos, or using basic apps. For gamers, PUS7009 has a few interesting options, such as ALLM, VRR, or Game Bar. It is not equipment for those who expect top-notch fluidity or quality, but it is entirely sufficient for occasional gaming on a console. A big plus is the readability of text – if someone plans to connect a computer and work with text, the TV performs quite well. When it comes to picture quality, it is not ideal. Blacks are rather gray, contrast is low, and brightness is limited. If we want to watch something in a brightly lit room, we may be disappointed. What about HDR? It's better to forget about it, as the lack of Dolby Vision support and limited technical capabilities mean that HDR content does not make a significant impression. The biggest downside is probably the TitanOS operating system. It has few applications and operates quite clumsily – sometimes it lags, and the interface can be irritating. If someone has previously used Android TV, TitanOS may seem like a step backward. Philips PUS7009 is a TV that will perform basic tasks well – watching TV, casual gaming, or browsing photos. However, if we care about good picture quality or an efficient operating system, it's better to look for another model. This is equipment for those who do not need fireworks but simply want a solid everyday TV.

The Philips PUS8079 is the brand's most affordable model featuring the multicoloured Ambilight backlighting, which has a dedicated fanbase. Given its budget price, this is a significant advantage. However, with a lower budget, certain compromises are to be expected. This TV is particularly suited for those who primarily watch content during the day. The main drawback is the contrast, which for a VA panel is quite low, and the luminance hovers around 200 nits, making it unsuitable for high-quality HDR content. However, there are notable positives. The tonal fidelity is relatively high, especially for content within the TV's capabilities, and the smooth gradation is impressive—hard to criticise. For casual gaming, low input lag is a plus. The operating system, though simple and sufficient for basic streaming like YouTube and Netflix, may fall short for users requiring more functionality. In conclusion, the Philips PUS8079 is ideal for those seeking an affordable TV with Ambilight, especially for daytime viewing, but may not be the best choice for high-end content or those seeking a more robust OS.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps

Where to buy

No links

No links

Contrast and black detail

3.1/10

4.3/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS7009 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,550:1

Review Philips PUS7009 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,650:1

Review Philips PUS7009 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,400:1

Review Philips PUS7009 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,650:1

Review Philips PUS7009 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,250:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,750:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,550:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,150:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,350:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,350:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

The Philips PUS7009 television, available in 43" and 55" variants, is equipped with an IPS panel, which unfortunately does not support achieving deep blacks. The results are exceptionally poor, and the television simply does not meet expectations in this regard. Due to the limitations of the panel, blacks resemble more shades of gray, which makes the picture quality in darker scenes leave much to be desired. For this reason, we do not recommend this model for watching at night with the lights off, as the lack of proper contrast spoils the experience of movie screenings. It is possible that the situation could be improved by the Ambilight system, which can trick perceived contrast, but unfortunately, it is not available in this model.

The Philips PUS8079 is equipped with a VA panel, and the size tested was 43". It's important to note that the manufacturer may change the panel type depending on the screen size. While a VA panel typically provides good black levels, the performance here is predictable given the TV's budget price. With a contrast ratio of around 2300:1, this is one of the lowest results for a VA panel, as more advanced units can achieve 2-3 times better results in this regard. As expected for such an affordable device, the backlighting is direct (Direct), offering uniform illumination but lacking zone division, which is typical for low-end models. One positive point is the light separation observed in the test with the movie "Oblivion." However, this advantage fades when watching "Revenant," where the picture quality drastically drops, leaving the scene looking flat and disappointing. Ultimately, while the Philips PUS8079 offers basic features for its price, it falls short of being a viable option for home cinema enthusiasts.

HDR effect quality

3.5/10

2.7/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 74.8%, Bt.2020: 54.5%
DCI P3: 80.0%, Bt.2020: 59.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS7009 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

237 nit

Review Philips PUS7009 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

216 nit

Review Philips PUS7009 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

281 nit

Review Philips PUS7009 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

230 nit

Review Philips PUS7009 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

268 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

179 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

177 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

202 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

164 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: HDR10+

HDR luminance chart:

Philips PUS8079

Philips PUS7009 (IPS)

In terms of HDR quality, PUS7009 (IPS) performs very poorly. A brightness level of 250 nits does not allow for enjoyment of HDR effects, and the image resembles more of a standard SDR. There is no talk of dynamic effects or vivid bursts of light. The coverage of the DCI-P3 color palette is only 75%, which is definitely insufficient. The lack of full color coverage means that the colors are not as vibrant as they should be, resulting in a flat and unconvincing image. There are no aspects for which this model can be praised in the context of HDR.

The Philips PUS8079 has a maximum brightness of just 202 nits in content with a wide tonal range, which is very low and makes it unsuitable for streaming movies and series in the highest quality. Additionally, using HDR with dynamic metadata doesn’t improve the situation, as the only HDR format available on this model is HDR10+, which is rare and has limited content support. The TV also uses WLED backlighting, which is not optimal and results in only 80% coverage of the DCI-P3 wide colour gamut. This limits the intensity of colours in HDR content.

Factory color reproduction

4/10

1.8/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

The television was tested in movie mode, which – despite its name – does not provide correct image display. The white balance in both 4K HDR and HD/SDR content is characterized by drops in red, causing the image to appear cooler and the colors to lose their natural warmth. The gamma brightness characteristic and EOTF curve confirm that the television has issues maintaining adequate brightness – it strongly boosts it, resulting in an unnaturally washed-out image. This effect can be seen in the comparisons below, where the overall look appears as if a milky filter has been applied. Additionally, limited coverage of a wide color gamut also does not favor quality – color checker tests indicate significant color fluctuations, making it difficult to achieve faithful image reproduction.

The best factory mode for colour reproduction and fidelity to the director's vision on the Philips PUS8079 was the "Film" mode. However, this setting displayed significant discrepancies between the filmmaker's intent and the actual output. In both SDR and HDR materials (with HDR being less affected), the white balance was off, showing a blue tint similar to store displays, rather than pure whites. When it came to SDR materials, gamma was notably lowered, cutting into the already limited contrast and brightening the overall image. The EOTF curve in HDR content also showed a significant drop below the reference line, making HDR materials appear even darker. The colour accuracy in both SDR and HDR modes was poor, with high deltaE values indicating that the colours were far from their intended representation.

Color reproduction after calibration

5.7/10

4.8/10

After calibration, the image has significantly improved, especially in terms of white balance, which is now more stable, and the hues have acquired a natural quality, eliminating the previous impression of being too cool. The calibration has brought noticeable benefits in terms of tonality – shadows and midtones are now more realistic, and the overall image appears more harmonious. Unfortunately, hardware limitations still affect image quality. The brightness characteristics remain problematic, despite our efforts, and due to poor coverage of the DCI-P3 and BT.2020 color palettes, delta E errors are still at a high level. Although calibration improved some aspects, the television still does not allow for complete satisfaction.

Fortunately, Philips incorporates advanced image correction tools across its televisions. SDR content benefited the most from these adjustments, with significant improvements in deltaE errors, white balance, and gamma. While the image still isn’t perfect, it is much more watchable, making it easier on the eyes during movie or series viewing. HDR content, however, was more challenging due to the television’s low luminance. While the EOTF curve and white balance improved, the corrections weren’t as effective as with SDR materials. It’s important to note that each unit may have different errors, some larger and some smaller, but the adjustments made were a step in the right direction.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.9/10

7.5/10

The gradation of tonal transitions in Philips PUS7009 is at a good level, without visible issues that could negatively impact content reception. With careful viewing, some minor imperfections can be noticed in bright, colorful transitions; however, they are subtle enough not to pose a hindrance for most users.

The tested television excels in the smoothness of tonal transitions, performing admirably in nearly every scene. While there are slight shortcomings in darker areas, particularly near blacks, the overall performance remains impressive, especially considering the device’s affordability.

One noticeable drawback, however, is the visible backlight bleed in the corners, a common issue with panels in budget-friendly models. Despite this, the television’s strong performance in tonal transitions significantly outweighs this minor flaw, making it a compelling option for its price range.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6/10

6.3/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

When it comes to tonal transitions in low-quality material, the function called "Distortion Reduction" (setting "minimum") effectively improves grading, eliminating ugly tonal transitions. However, this setting on Philips televisions is quite aggressive – while it does not blur grain or high-quality material, it can introduce unwanted effects and blur elements that should remain sharp with a poorer signal.

In terms of image scaling, Philips PUS7009 performs decently. A significant advantage is the lack of cropped image edges, meaning no overscan, which allows for displaying the full frame without loss. The image is noticeably improved, making characters and backgrounds, such as the model or branches in the background, look quite detailed and natural, even with lower quality signals. Although scaling is not perfect, as it can remove desired details in the distance, the results are good enough for most users to be satisfied.

Let us revisit the topic of tonal transitions, this time in the context of overall image quality enhancement. As shown in the photo on the left, the gradation improvement feature delivers excellent results. It provides multiple settings, each offering noticeable benefits without softening the film grain effect. Once again, it must be emphasised that this feature is the standout advantage of the tested television.

On the other hand, the television’s performance in image scaling leaves much to be desired. Fine details often appear heavily jagged, with a noticeable white halo around figures. Additionally, the significant artificial sharpening detracts from the overall image quality.

Blur and motion smoothness

5/10

4.2/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
No
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
Nie
Nie
BFI function 120Hz
Nie
Nie
Brightness drop with BFI
0%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Philips PUS7009 does not have any motion smoothing feature for movies, which means we cannot choose whether the picture should be more stuttery or more cinematic. These features could improve more dynamic scenes. As for motion blur, despite using a 60Hz IPS panel, the situation looks quite good. The response time between pixels is better than in VA panel versions, which means that motion blur remains at an acceptable level and does not significantly affect the viewing comfort of dynamic scenes.

This paragraph will be notably brief due to the absence of even basic motion-smoothing functionality, which is unsurprising given the device's budget-oriented nature. The VA panel used here is not known for exceptional sharpness and is instead associated with high contrast and slower response times, as confirmed by the matrix analysis results. Photos captured during fast motion reveal typical motion blur for this type of panel. While not ideal, the television could be conditionally suitable for watching sports, though viewers should expect less-than-optimal motion clarity. Additionally, films may exhibit noticeable stuttering due to the lack of any motion-smoothing features, even basic ones.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

4.7/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

In terms of compatibility with consoles, Philips PUS7009 is suitable for casual gamers. Despite using HDMI 2.0, the TV offers access to features such as ALLM (Auto Low Latency Mode), VRR (Variable Refresh Rate), and Game Bar. ALLM automatically switches the TV to low latency mode, allowing for faster response during gameplay, while VRR dynamically adjusts the refresh rate to reduce screen tearing. Game Bar is a tool that provides quick access to game settings and real-time monitoring of parameters - though we believe it appears weaker compared to competing Game Bars.

Unfortunately, more demanding gamers may be disappointed. Philips PUS7009 does not support advanced HDR formats in games or high refresh rates, due to the use of a 60 Hz panel. The lack of support for these features limits the TV's ability to deliver smooth and fully detailed experiences during fast-paced gameplay.

The Philips PUS8079 provides only basic gaming features, including ALLM, VRR, and a Game Bar. The key highlight is the inclusion of dynamic frequency adjustment, which ensures a smooth image with minimal screen tearing—an impressive offering for this price range.

A notable benefit for gamers is the presence of the Game Bar, allowing adjustments to be made "on the fly" without needing to exit the game. Importantly, this feature retains options found in higher-end models, such as shadow enhancement for improved visibility in darker areas and a colour filter designed to assist gamers with visual impairments.

Input lag

10/10

9.9/10

SDR

1080p60
11 ms
14 ms
1080p120
2160p60
11 ms
14 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
11 ms
14 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

Input lag in PUS7009 is at a very good level – it amounts to just 11 ms for supported resolutions. For most players, this low level of latency should be satisfactory, providing smooth and responsive experiences during gameplay.

The results of the input lag measurements in PUS8079 are at a high level, regardless of the signal or resolution. All gamers will certainly appreciate the manufacturer's efforts, as a game running at 4K60Hz with HDR will have only 13 ms of latency, which is practically unnoticeable even in online games.

Compatibility with PC

5/10

2/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
43ms
14ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RGB
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No

Philips PUS7009 is one of the better choices as a monitor for office work. The readability of fonts is very good, regardless of the background – both on light and dark backgrounds, the text remains clear and easy to read. In daily use, especially with text and office tasks, this television performs excellently. However, computer gamers may be somewhat disappointed – the input lag in "Monitor" mode of 43 ms is too high to ensure comfortable gameplay in fast-paced games that require quick reactions. The use of a 60 Hz panel and lack of support for G-Sync means that the television does not meet the standards expected by PC gamers. Therefore, the rating in this category is lower, although the device performs well for everyday computer use for work.

When connecting the Philips PUS8079 to a computer to use it as a monitor, it delivers a low input lag of 14 ms, which is barely noticeable in terms of mouse-screen-eye interaction. However, the television falls short in font clarity, making it unsuitable for use as a monitor. The issue lies in the phenomenon known as dithering, which becomes apparent in the display of grey text. Not all subpixels are lit on adjacent pixels as they should be, resulting in blurry text that severely impacts readability and makes extended work impractical.

Viewing angles

6.8/10

3.8/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
71%
41%

Philips PUS7009, thanks to the use of an IPS panel, offers quite good viewing angles. The image remains relatively clear and uniform even when viewed from a greater angle, which is definitely a better result compared to the variant with a VA panel, where there is usually a rapid deterioration in image quality with deviations from the axis.

One of the most notable and frequent drawbacks of VA panels is their limited viewing angles, especially in models without angular coatings that could improve performance in this area. Interestingly, the Philips PUS8079 performed somewhat better in this regard compared to the PML9009 we recently tested. However, even with this slight improvement, a small deviation from the centre still leads to noticeable colour degradation and a significant reduction in contrast.

TV efficiency during daytime

4.5/10

2.6/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Good
Słabe
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

Philips PUS8079: 192 cd/m2

Philips PUS7009 (IPS): 286 cd/m2

Although the panel in PUS7009 is equipped with a satin coating that effectively suppresses reflections, the brightness level of 280 nits in SDR mode is simply too low for the television to perform well in bright rooms. As a result, in highly sunlit conditions, details on the screen may be hard to discern, which reduces user comfort during the day.

During our test sequence, we also evaluated the television’s performance in daytime viewing conditions, which we recommend given the insufficient contrast for darker environments. Unfortunately, the results were disappointing. The satin coating didn't help much, and combined with the television's low luminance, this effectively rules it out for use in a bright, sunny room.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
White LED
White LED
Software version during testing
TPN246E_V246.004.012.161
TPN246E_V246.004.012.161
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity:

Philips PUS7009 (IPS)

Philips PUS8079

TV features

6.8/10

5/10

  • System
    Titan OS
    Titan OS
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • AirPlay
    No
    No
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
  • Possibility to connect Bluetooth headphones to the TV
    Yes
    No
  • Possibility to simultaneously use Bluetooth headphones and the TV speaker
    Yes
    No
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    RF
    Infrared
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes

Philips has decided this year to change its approach to the operating system, replacing the previous open Google TV system with its own TitanOS. As is often the case with new solutions, TitanOS is struggling with typical growing pains. Currently, it offers only basic applications, and the app store leaves much to be desired, which may disappoint users expecting a rich selection of programs. Additionally, the lack of support for AirPlay functionality and the inability to record to USB are further limitations that may affect the overall user experience.

An interesting feature of the models with TitanOS is the new remote control, which is very convenient to use thanks to its backlighting. Unfortunately, its wireless operation is not entirely consistent. The hybrid design means that sometimes you need to aim at the TV, and other times you do not – it depends on the buttons being used. This is simply irritating.

On the positive side, support for Bluetooth should be noted, allowing for the connection of a mouse or other peripheral devices. This is particularly useful when using the browser, which may serve as an alternative due to the limited availability of applications in the TitanOS app store.

One of the standout features of Philips televisions is, without a doubt, the multicoloured Ambilight backlighting. Positioned on the back of the device, this system displays colours that adjust to what’s happening on screen, creating a more immersive viewing experience. The operating system, TitanOS, powers the television, but it is more closed and limited compared to Google TV-based models from the brand. A significant drawback is the lack of essential apps, such as Apple TV, MAX, Canal+, or Player. Additionally, TitanOS' closed nature restricts basic functions like programming recordings or recording to USB. Apple device users may also be disappointed by the absence of AirPlay, which allows easy screen streaming. On the plus side, it’s possible to connect a keyboard and mouse for smoother navigation through the menu. While headphones can be connected, they must be wired, and sound can also be played through the TV’s speakers. Another inconvenience is that the TV uses IR for control instead of Bluetooth, which feels outdated in today’s tech landscape.

In summary: TitanOs has quite a few "buts," especially for individuals who use many streaming platforms. Instead, it is an option for those who limit themselves to the so-called holy trinity of Netflix, YouTube, and CDA.

Playing files from USB

8/10

8/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
No
12 Mpix
No
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
No
24 Mpix
No
No
28 Mpix
No
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

In terms of playing files from USB, Philips PUS7009 performs quite decently. The TV plays most popular formats of photos, audio, and video, and an additional plus is the support for Polish subtitles and the ability to change fonts. Unfortunately, it has issues with playing some image resolutions.

The default media player on the Philips PUS8079 offers a broad range of capabilities but it has some limitations. It supports nearly all video formats, with notable exceptions like Dolby Vision and the less commonly used .asf format. However, it struggles with the H.265 HEVC codec at high bitrates and does not support .sub subtitle files, which are fairly popular. For photos, the player performs reasonably well, but it lacks support for certain resolutions and formats, such as HEIC, which is commonly used by Apple devices. In terms of audio, the player excels and cannot be faulted. Unfortunately, due to system limitations, there is no option to expand its functionality, so users are limited to the features provided by the manufacturer.

Apps

7/10

7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Viaplay
OK
Player_TVN
No
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Viaplay
OK
Player_TVN
No
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
MAX
No
Kodi

Sound

5.6/10

5.1/10

  • Subjective sound quality:
    5.6/10
    5.1/10
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1:
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1:
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC):
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD:
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA:
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio:
    Yes
    Yes

The sound in Philips PUS7009 is rather flat and does not stand out against other televisions. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that the TV supports all popular audio formats, including Dolby and DTS, which is a plus in the context of compatibility with various audio sources.

The best thing about the sound system in the Philips PUS8079 is that it is present. Unfortunately, there is virtually no midrange or bass, and the high frequencies are somewhat unpleasant. Interestingly, the television does include a full set of essential audio codecs, including Dolby Atmos and DTS-HD Master Audio, making it easy to connect to a home theatre system.